Bug 765618

Summary: Can't update python-libs RPM due to dependency issue...
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Ryan <ryan.redhat>
Component: pythonAssignee: Dave Malcolm <dmalcolm>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: BaseOS QE - Apps <qe-baseos-apps>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.2   
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-12 19:25:35 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Ryan 2011-12-08 23:01:56 UTC 
Description of problem:
Can't update python-libs

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
[root@gobo log]# uname -a 
Linux gobo.ndc.nasa.gov 2.6.32-131.17.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Sep 29 10:24:25 EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[root@gobo log]# cat /etc/redhat-release 
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation release 6.2 (Santiago)


How reproducible:
yum upgrade python-libs


Actual results:
Dec  8 11:34:09 gobo autoupdates: Error: Package: python-libs-2.6.6-20.el6.i686 (@6-x86_64-extras)
Dec  8 11:34:09 gobo autoupdates:            Requires: python = 2.6.6-20.el6
Dec  8 11:34:09 gobo autoupdates:            Removing: python-2.6.6-20.el6.x86_64 (@6-x86_64-os)
Dec  8 11:34:09 gobo autoupdates:                python = 2.6.6-20.el6
Dec  8 11:34:09 gobo autoupdates:            Updated By: python-2.6.6-29.el6.x86_64 (6-x86_64-updates-testing)
Dec  8 11:34:09 gobo autoupdates:                python = 2.6.6-29.el6
Dec  8 11:34:09 gobo autoupdates:            Available: python-2.6.5-3.el6_0.2.i686 (6-x86_64-updates)
Dec  8 11:34:09 gobo autoupdates:                python = 2.6.5-3.el6_0.2

Expected results:
It to upgrade
Comment 2 Ryan 2011-12-12 17:24:44 UTC 
This has been resolved.  Just needed the repo to have the i686 version as well as the 64-bit one.
Comment 3 Dave Malcolm 2011-12-12 19:25:35 UTC 
Thanks for filing this bug.

Based on comment #2, it looks like this was a configuration issue on the host.  Given that, I'm going to close this bug, marking it with the "NOTABUG" resolution - but feel free to reopen it if I've misunderstood.