Bug 766993

Summary:	no xml validation on deployable xml
Product:	[Retired] CloudForms Cloud Engine	Reporter:	Dave Johnson <dajohnso>
Component:	aeolus-conductor	Assignee:	Jan Provaznik <jprovazn>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	wes hayutin <whayutin>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	1.0.0	CC:	akarol, deltacloud-maint, slinaber, ssachdev
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-05-15 21:28:54 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Dave Johnson 2011-12-12 22:41:03 UTC

Description of problem:
================================
I noticed that the deployable xml from a catalog entry is not validated for closing elements.  This xml should? (at least, could) go through the same general xml validator that is being used for the template xml.

Uploading a good deployable xml and removing the closing image element, saves successfully.  Would think we would want to validate that xml instead of letting the actual deploy error out on it.

Comment 2 Jan Provaznik 2012-01-02 09:25:18 UTC

fixed in commit d7d7a295ad5b774103dbaebdb820d9ea49ad066f

Comment 3 Steve Linabery 2012-01-10 18:12:18 UTC

d7d7a295ad5b774103dbaebdb820d9ea49ad066f in aeolus-conductor-0.8.0-2.el6.src.rpm

Comment 4 Dave Johnson 2012-01-11 21:25:43 UTC

good 2 go in aeolus-conductor-doc-0.8.0-5.el6.noarch

Comment 5 wes hayutin 2012-01-12 16:16:50 UTC

bugs in verified or on_qa moving off tracker

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2012-05-15 21:28:54 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0583.html