Bug 76749

Summary: Postfix spec file should inherit CCARGS/AUXLIBS envars
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Corey Crawford <ccrawford>
Component: postfixAssignee: John Dennis <jdennis>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 8.0CC: timp
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-06-13 15:19:20 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Corey Crawford 2002-10-25 19:09:49 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; T312461)

Description of problem:
When rebuilding or recompiling the postfix RPM via the postfix src rpm it would 
be exceptionally nice if it looked at your CCARGS and AUXLIBS environment 
variables for compilation. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Set CCARGS with '> export CCARGS="-I/usr/include/mysql"'
2. Run rpmbuild --rebuild or --recompile on src.rpm

	

Actual Results:  Compiles with predefined CCARGS and AUXLIBS - defined in 
postfix.spec

Expected Results:  Should inherit exported args to allow for customized building

Additional info:

<><> START DIFF -U <><>
--- postfix-old.spec    2002-10-25 12:15:40.000000000 -0600
+++ postfix.spec        2002-10-25 12:11:24.000000000 -0600
@@ -143,8 +143,8 @@
 %build
 umask 022

-CCARGS=
-AUXLIBS=
+CCARGS=${CCARGS}
+AUXLIBS=${AUXLIBS}

 %ifarch s390 s390x ppc
 CCARGS="${CCARGS} -fsigned-char"
<><> END DIFF -U <><>

Comment 3 John Dennis 2003-06-13 15:19:20 UTC
Here at Red Hat we worry a lot about reproducable builds. Having the spec file
inadvertantly pick something up from the environment is an uncomfortable
feeling. It's easy to edit the spec file and I think thats the right answer in
this case.