Bug 76814
Summary: | sendmail.mc could use some attention | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Andrew E. Mileski <andrewm> |
Component: | sendmail | Assignee: | Florian La Roche <laroche> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 8.0 | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2002-10-27 11:09:26 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Andrew E. Mileski
2002-10-27 11:09:19 UTC
local-host-names does not contain "localhost.localdomain", but I have made all other changes you have proposed above. I'll still have to think about ops.me... http://people.redhat.com/laroche/sendmail-8.12.6-3 contains the current rpm... Hope to hear more feedback from you..., thanks a lot, Florian La Roche Thanks for the attention :) My original note had a few errors, which you've found one. Specifically, you are correct about local-host-names; I was thinking of the entries in the access file. The manual is actually op.me not ops.me And as long as you are listening, a pretty good spam fighter is: dnl DNS based IP address blocking lists FEATURE(`dnsbl',`relays.ordb.org')dnl FEATURE(`dnsbl',`bl.spamcop.net')dnl FEATURE(`dnsbl',`sbl.spamhaus.org')dnl FEATURE(`dnsbl',`spews.relays.osirusoft.com')dnl Though Red Hat probably would want to comment (dnl) these out ... just like the existing feature about allowing mail from unresolvable domains (eliminates at least 50% of all spam). I really wouldn't recommended putting those block lists in. And FYI, Spamcop bl says it shouldn't be used in production and is experimental. Infact I wouldn't recommend ANY of those blocklists. I'll not add this list of spam filters, as they are changing too fast. This should better be placed on www.sendmail.org or similar sites, that can adapt to newer recommended sites faster. greetings, Florian La Roche |