Bug 768941

Summary:	object-storage:parameter updation inside /etc/swift/swift.conf
Product:	[Community] GlusterFS	Reporter:	Saurabh <saujain>
Component:	object-storage	Assignee:	Junaid <junaid>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Saurabh <saujain>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	pre-release	CC:	gluster-bugs, junaid, mzywusko, rfortier, vagarwal
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	glusterfs-3.4.0	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-07-24 17:20:45 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	817967

Description Saurabh 2011-12-19 13:44:36 UTC

Description of problem:

Presently in order use swift and swift-plugin we are trying to use same /etc/swift/swift.conf and trying to update the parameter,
Enable_plugin = yes/no

according to me when using original swift we should use the same /etc/swift/swift.conf as mentioned by openstack, since we are using the other *.conf files from original swift.

Toggling with yes/no for this parameter may add to confusion.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Saurabh 2012-04-24 11:36:45 UTC

requesting the dev to put the description for qualifying this bug as "ON_QA"

Comment 2 Junaid 2012-06-12 05:53:41 UTC

By default the Gluster-swift plugin uses GlusterFS as the storage backend but it can also be configured to behave as openstack. To distinguish between these two cases we added the parameter.

Comment 3 Saurabh 2012-06-12 11:32:15 UTC

accepting as per Junaid's comment2