DescriptionStephen Gallagher
2011-12-20 13:29:21 UTC
This is not an issue with the currently-released SSSD packages in RHEL 6.2. It is pre-emptively opened for a new requirement that we will have in RHEL 6.3.
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #769175 +++
Description of problem:
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
sssd-1.7.0-0.20111219T1638Zgitbdd2050.fc15.x86_64
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Update Fedora 15 with the latest SSSD bits from http://jdennis.fedorapeople.org/ipa-devel/fedora/$releasever/$basearch/os/
2. ipa-client-install
3. Observe /var/log/messages
Actual results:
Dec 20 20:13:50 dhcp201-106 setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/sssd from using the sys_admin capability. For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l 650ca357-5e3a-455b-b028-4d0afaa8e5d0
Expected results:
No SELinux denials and SSSD should be started successfully.
Additional info:
SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/sssd from using the sys_admin capability.
***** Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests ***************************
If you believe that sssd should have the sys_admin capability by default.
Then you should report this as a bug.
You can generate a local policy module to allow this access.
Do
allow this access for now by executing:
# grep sssd /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -M mypol
# semodule -i mypol.pp
--- Additional comment from sgallagh on 2011-12-20 08:27:31 EST ---
SSSD grew a dependency on the sys_admin capability because it is now using keyctl_join_session_keyring() and keyctl_setperm() to connect to the kernel keyring and store passwords securely while the SSSD is running (such as for deferred kinit operation).
We need this new requirement added to SSSD in the selinux policy.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0780.html