Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||Evolution Japanese printing is broken.|
|Product:||[Retired] Red Hat Linux||Reporter:||Nakai <ynakai>|
|Component:||gtkhtml||Assignee:||Havoc Pennington <hp>|
|Status:||CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE||QA Contact:|
|Target Milestone:||---||Keywords:||MoveUpstream, Triaged|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2003-04-16 04:50:44 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Nakai 2002-10-30 02:34:23 EST
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ja-JP; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020830 Description of problem: Evolution Japanese mail printing is broken. Gnumeric and gedit works, so it's not gnome-print problem but evolution's problem. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Print Japanese mail. 2. All Japanese chars are missing. 3. Sucks. Additional info:
Comment 1 Akira TAGOH 2002-10-30 08:37:47 EST
Even if you change the printing font with gtkhtml-properties-capplet, can't you print it out? I think the printing is not broken. but the default font is broken for Japanese.
Comment 2 Akira TAGOH 2002-11-11 05:32:56 EST
Well, Ok. this problem was caused by some issues: - we can't print CJK text out with the current default font; default font should be gettextize. - gtkhtml-properties-capplet's UI sucks; needed stuff for printing is a family name and font size. but gtkhtml-properties-capplet provides it with gtkfontsel. it contains the unusable fonts for printing, and that configuration is saved as XLFD. So UI needs to be rewritten for gnome-print. - we missed any link for gtkhtml-properties-capplet; people can't change it from Evolution. the font properties are actually gtkhtml stuff. but people who doesn't know it's gtkhtml stuff, assumes it's Evolution issue.
Comment 3 Havoc Pennington 2003-01-12 23:22:52 EST
How much of this has already been filed on bugzilla.ximian.com? Do we have links to those bugs? Do we have patches?
Comment 4 Akira TAGOH 2003-04-16 04:50:44 EDT
I think it was fixed in Red Hat Linux 9. sorry for too late reply.