Bug 76960

Summary: Evolution Japanese printing is broken.
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Nakai <ynakai>
Component: gtkhtmlAssignee: Havoc Pennington <hp>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 8.0CC: eng-asia-list, katzj
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: MoveUpstream, Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-04-16 04:50:44 EDT Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 79579    

Description Nakai 2002-10-30 02:34:23 EST
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ja-JP; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020830

Description of problem:
Evolution Japanese mail printing is broken.
Gnumeric and gedit works, so it's not gnome-print
problem but evolution's problem.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Print Japanese mail.
2. All Japanese chars are missing.
3. Sucks.
	

Additional info:
Comment 1 Akira TAGOH 2002-10-30 08:37:47 EST
Even if you change the printing font with gtkhtml-properties-capplet, can't you
print it out?
I think the printing is not broken. but the default font is broken for Japanese.
Comment 2 Akira TAGOH 2002-11-11 05:32:56 EST
Well, Ok. this problem was caused by some issues:
- we can't print CJK text out with the current default font; default font should
be gettextize.
- gtkhtml-properties-capplet's UI sucks; needed stuff for printing is a family
name and font size. but gtkhtml-properties-capplet provides it with gtkfontsel.
it contains the unusable fonts for printing, and that configuration is saved as
XLFD. So UI needs to be rewritten for gnome-print.
- we missed any link for gtkhtml-properties-capplet; people can't change it from
Evolution. the font properties are actually gtkhtml stuff. but people who
doesn't know it's gtkhtml stuff, assumes it's Evolution issue.
Comment 3 Havoc Pennington 2003-01-12 23:22:52 EST
How much of this has already been filed on bugzilla.ximian.com?
Do we have links to those bugs? Do we have patches?
Comment 4 Akira TAGOH 2003-04-16 04:50:44 EDT
I think it was fixed in Red Hat Linux 9. sorry for too late reply.