| Summary: | i386 PAE kernel source symlink problem. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Madison Kelly <mkelly> |
| Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Kernel Maintainer List <kernel-maint> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | gansalmon, itamar, jonathan, kernel-maint, madhu.chinakonda |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i686 | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-01-14 18:25:45 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Madison Kelly
2011-12-24 22:33:14 UTC
yum -y install kernel-PAE-devel was missing. It wasn't installed by; yum groupinstall "Development Libraries" "Development Tools" "Fedora Packager" Is this by design? If not, can someone move this ticket to the appropriate place? If it is intended to skip that package, please close this as NOTABUG. (In reply to comment #1) > yum -y install kernel-PAE-devel was missing. It wasn't installed by; > > yum groupinstall "Development Libraries" "Development Tools" "Fedora Packager" None of those groups are really intended to be used for kernel development. > Is this by design? If not, can someone move this ticket to the appropriate > place? If it is intended to skip that package, please close this as NOTABUG. I wouldn't go so far as to say by design, but it's certainly correct that the various kernel-devel packages aren't intended to be in those groups. > None of those groups are really intended to be used for kernel development. Is there a more appropriate group? > I wouldn't go so far as to say by design, but it's certainly correct that the > various kernel-devel packages aren't intended to be in those groups. Is there something further worth exploring? Given this is closed, probably not. :) Cheers |