Bug 770286

Summary:	Provide native systemd service
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Jóhann B. Guðmundsson <johannbg>
Component:	cyphesis	Assignee:	Martin Preisler <mpreisle>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	19	CC:	atorkhov, bruno, gwync, johannbg, wart
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-05-26 09:43:51 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	751869

Description Jóhann B. Guðmundsson 2011-12-25 16:15:38 UTC

Description of problem:

Let's get the ball rolling on this one...

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines:Systemd
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Systemd


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2012-01-12 16:14:50 UTC

This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 2 Gwyn Ciesla 2012-05-15 13:14:04 UTC

Martin, any objection to my making this change?

Comment 3 Martin Preisler 2012-05-15 13:57:20 UTC

Would be great, no objections at all! I just haven't gotten to it yet.

So far I have only talked to upstream whether they want systemd support there. The outcome is that for now this should stay downstream.

Comment 4 Gwyn Ciesla 2012-05-15 16:01:25 UTC

Cool, one other concern.  This requires postgresql-server, and the init script patch assumes that the DB is local.  Would it not be better to decouple the two, to both simplify packaging and allow a remote DB?

Comment 5 Martin Preisler 2012-05-16 06:30:07 UTC

Yeah, it certainly would.

I am not the author of the init script, so I am not sure what the reasoning was. Perhaps there are some hidden problems there.

Comment 6 Fedora End Of Life 2013-04-03 16:24:41 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 19 development cycle.
Changing version to '19'.

(As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 19 development
cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 19 End Of Life. Thank you.)

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora19

Comment 7 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson 2014-05-26 09:43:51 UTC

Given that I have left the project and a new individual may or may not continue with systemd integration in the project by submitting new feature following whatever demands FPC and FESCo might have and thus new units in the process I'm closing this and all remaining bugs I had submitted for this particular feature as WONTFIX