Bug 77129

Summary: /sbin/mkinitrd expects kudzu without package requiring it
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: ratness
Component: mkinitrdAssignee: Peter Jones <pjones>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 8.0   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-08-04 20:32:41 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description ratness 2002-11-01 15:55:43 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 5.0; T312461)

Description of problem:
/sbin/mkinitrd, line 313, makes reference to kudzu, but the mkinitrd package 
doesn't require it.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -e kudzu
2. rpm -U [some new kernel]
3.


Actual Results:  Installing...
   1:kernel                 ########################################### [100%]
/sbin/mkinitrd: line 1: kudzu: command not found


Expected Results:  Installing...
   1:kernel                 ########################################### [100%]


Additional info:

Super LOW priority.

I hate kudzu, pleeease don't "fix" this by requiring kudzu in the package; just 
put an  "if -x kudzu" around it.  :)

Comment 1 Jeremy Katz 2003-01-06 04:55:13 UTC
Something similar done in mkinitrd-3.4.34-1

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2006-08-04 20:32:41 UTC
Red Hat Linux and Red Hat Powertools are currently no longer supported by Red
Hat, Inc. In an effort to clean up bugzilla, we are closing all bugs in MODIFIED
state for these products.

However, we do want to make sure that nothing important slips through the
cracks. If, in fact, these issues are not resolved in a current Fedora Core
Release (such as Fedora Core 5), please open a new issues stating so. Thanks.