| Summary: | Better document ls behaviour for formatting options('ls -Zl' and 'ls -lZ' show different results) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | ryo fujita <rfujita> |
| Component: | coreutils | Assignee: | Ondrej Vasik <ovasik> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | qe-baseos-daemons |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 6.2 | CC: | azelinka, kdudka, meyering, prc |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | coreutils-8.4-17.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-06-20 14:34:25 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
ryo fujita
2012-01-05 08:18:11 UTC
Please have a look at the following bugs:
bug 448903 - Incorrect output of ls -lZ
bug 524202 - "ls -lZ" is not the same as "ls -Zl"
Although it is not a bug, as there are more such reports, I think it would be good to improve the ls info documentation a bit. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0933.html |