Bug 772650
| Summary: | [abrt] evolution-data-server-3.2.2-2.fc16: chkResponseList: Process /usr/libexec/e-addressbook-factory was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh> | ||||||||||
| Component: | evolution-data-server | Assignee: | Matthew Barnes <mbarnes> | ||||||||||
| Status: | CLOSED UPSTREAM | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||||||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||||||
| Version: | 16 | CC: | kirillnud82, mbarnes, mcaspers, mcrha | ||||||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | abrt_hash:f1057f67958b9cc10e6c8bab2b66b12e31119830 | ||||||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2012-01-24 07:45:17 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||||
|
Description
Stephen Gallagher
2012-01-09 14:24:58 UTC
Created attachment 551574 [details]
File: dso_list
Created attachment 551575 [details]
File: maps
Created attachment 551576 [details]
File: backtrace
Thanks for a bug report. I see that one Thread 7 is finalizing (freeing) your LDAP backend, while Thread 1 is still working with some LDAP book. The strange thing is that the Thread 7 shows debug info for the ldap backend, but the Thread 1 not. Do you have installed debuginfo package for evolution-data-server of the same version as the binary package, please? And if not, could you install it and try to reproduce the issue, please? (Though I guess it'll be pretty hard to reproduce, as it may depend on "good" timing.) This can be, on the first look, related to the upstream bug [1] too. [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=667424 I've installed the debuginfo packages manually now. It's strange, because ABRT supposedly installed all of the appropriate ones, but now they are not there. Perhaps ABRT doesn't keep them around after reporting? Anyway, if it recurs, I'll let you know. (In reply to comment #5) > I've installed the debuginfo packages manually now. It's strange, because ABRT > supposedly installed all of the appropriate ones, but now they are not there. > Perhaps ABRT doesn't keep them around after reporting? > > Anyway, if it recurs, I'll let you know. Ok, I figured out why my debuginfo was not installed properly. Looks like there was a conflict between libdb-debuginfo and db4-debuginfo that was preventing the debuginfo from evolution-data-server from being installed. I've removed the conflict and manually installed the correct debuginfo. Good. Thanks for your help with this. I'll mark this to need-info state to know that this is waiting for an updated backtrace. In case it'll not arise again the bug will be closed, or maybe a new one will be entered by ABRT itself. Sending an email with two attachments to three recipients and three CCs backtrace_rating: 4 Package: evolution-data-server-3.2.3-1.fc16 OS Release: Fedora release 16 (Verne) Created attachment 556974 [details]
File: backtrace
Hopefully the new backtrace will provide you with better information. Thanks for the update. I think I got it. the reasons for missing debuginfo is, probably, that the functions are from LDAP, which is linked statically into evolution-data-server, thus the backtrace contains only function names for it. From the backtrace the management about "poll_ldap" function seems to be a cause for a trouble here, it's not removed from a "loop" when it should. I found similar upstream bug for this [1], which is from bug #675772. I'm moving this upstream too, maybe someone will look on it. Please see [1] for any further updates. If possible, please CC yourself there, in case upstream developers will have additional questions. [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641825 *** Bug 787667 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 796524 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 807143 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 819639 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |