Bug 772997
Summary: | autoconf should install a config.site that favors lib64 on 64-bit machines | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Eric Blake <eblake> | |
Component: | autoconf | Assignee: | Pavel Raiskup <praiskup> | |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | qe-baseos-tools-bugs | |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | unspecified | |||
Version: | 6.2 | CC: | agruenba, s.egbert | |
Target Milestone: | rc | |||
Target Release: | --- | |||
Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
OS: | Unspecified | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 772999 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-07-25 12:57:51 UTC | Type: | --- | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | 1196340 | |||
Bug Blocks: | 772999 |
Description
Eric Blake
2012-01-10 15:59:57 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an exception in the current release, please ask your support representative. This doesn't apply to any RPM builds as rpm always runs configure with --libdir=%{_libdir}, so only local builds from tarballs or SCM checkouts will be affected by this. This needs to be a arch specific /usr/share/config.site or 32bit builds that worked before will now suddenly fail as they would need --libdir=/usr/lib now. But anyhow, it is any easy and straightforward fix. This request was not resolved in time for the current release. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. This request was erroneously removed from consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4, which is currently under development. This request will be evaluated for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4. This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated in the current release, Red Hat is unable to address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated in the current release, Red Hat is unable to address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. After several iterations in Fedora, I would consider Fedora's config.site file safe to backport -- but I'm afraid it's been too late for RHEL6 for some time. Feel free to clone this against RHEL7, but note that if we wanted to have this fixed we need to cooperate the update with related fix for redhat-rpm-config package (to avoid breaking RHEL package builds). This is probably why many developers are moving away from CentOS. A collection of cases for inserting Fedora’s config.site into CentOS distro. https://github.com/egberts/easy-admin/issues/1 |