Bug 777609 (SOA-118)

Summary: Unable to serialize rule base ( NotSerializableException: org.drools.base.FireAllRulesRuleBaseUpdateListener)
Product: [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 4 Reporter: Jiri Pechanec <jpechane>
Component: JBoss RulesAssignee: Fernando Meyer <fmcamargo>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 4.2 IR5   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 4.2 IR8   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SOA-118
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Standalone
Last Closed: 2007-12-05 03:11:00 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 777542    

Description Jiri Pechanec 2007-11-09 15:03:04 UTC
Date of First Response: 2007-11-10 06:09:21
project_key: SOA

When I am trying to serialize rulebase, I am getting the exception

Comment 1 Jiri Pechanec 2007-11-09 15:03:18 UTC
Link: Added: This issue depends JBRULES-1283


Comment 2 Mark Little 2007-11-10 11:09:21 UTC
We need a patch from the Drools team for this codebase.

Comment 3 Mark Proctor 2007-11-12 19:45:18 UTC
As SVN can produce or apply adhoc patches on the fly, based on source revisions - which is supplied in the JBRules JIRA - a static patch file is redundant. All you do is point your merge tool at our 4.0.x branch and select the revision(s) that applied to this JIRA change, it can then apply the needed patch or produce a patch file for you.

Comment 4 Mark Proctor 2007-11-12 19:46:55 UTC
But as stated in the Drools JIRA itself, if you check the subversion commits you'll see we already applied this for you a while back. But of course your patch process will tell you his too.

Comment 5 Mark Little 2007-11-13 15:59:07 UTC
Thanks Mark.

Platform guys to confirm patch is applied.

Comment 6 Len DiMaggio 2007-11-16 21:30:34 UTC
Link: Added: This issue is a dependency of SOA-43


Comment 7 Jiri Pechanec 2007-11-26 14:51:18 UTC
Problem still persists

Comment 9 Mike Brock 2007-12-04 14:18:33 UTC
done.