| Summary: | jbpm-Users_guide.pdf - references the old seam site and it is out of date. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 4 | Reporter: | Jay Balunas <tech4j> |
| Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Joshua Wulf <jwulf> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 4.2 CP01 | CC: | lcarlon |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 4.2 CP02 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| URL: | http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SOA-507 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2008-05-23 02:57:34 UTC | Type: | Task |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Jay Balunas
2008-04-08 21:10:48 UTC
Could you please give the incorrect sentence and perhaps some context around it so that I can grep for it. thanks, -josh Sure - I sorry I meant to include that :) " This feature becomes really powerfull in a JBoss SEAM environment. Because of the integration between jBPM and JBoss SEAM [http://www.jboss.com/products/seam], all of your backed beans, EJB's and other one-kind-of-stuff becomes available right inside of your process definition. Thanks Gavin ! Absolutely awsome ! :-) " I took out the shout out to Gavin. Kinda cool in the project docs - not so cool in the platform ones. But that site I think is the latest. It's the one linked from the front page of jboss.com. Perhaps you're thinking of seamframework.org? That's the latest site for the project, rather than the product. seamframework.org is the project site. The jboss.com site has been previously updated so that most of the links go to seamframework.org for the latest information. Pointing to the .com site should be fine as long as is it updated. Who's responsibility is that? |