Bug 778827 (SOA-1275)

Summary:	Undocumented ESB listeners
Product:	[JBoss] JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 4	Reporter:	Aaron Pestel <ammppp>
Component:	Documentation	Assignee:	David Le Sage <dlesage>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	4.3 GA
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	FUTURE
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
URL:	http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SOA-1275
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-12-02 21:49:31 UTC	Type:	Feature Request
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Aaron Pestel 2009-04-07 23:58:00 UTC

Date of First Response: 2009-10-27 15:44:49
project_key: SOA

The following gateways/listeners are not document in the programmer's guide:  http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/JBoss_SOA_Platform/4.3.GA/html-single/Programmers_Guide/index.html#sect-SOA_ESB_Programmers_Guide-Configuration-Transport_Specific_Type_Implementations

1.)  JBR/HTTP(S)
2.)  JBR/Socket
3.)  JCA/Mail

The only listener that appears to be very well document is FTP.

Comment 1 Burr Sutter 2009-10-27 19:44:49 UTC

Darrin, I think this one should be assigned to you, I think it is more of a bug than a feature

Comment 2 Kevin Conner 2009-10-27 19:51:05 UTC

We never officially supported JCA/Mail integration in the project because the mail resource adapter was buggy.  Has this been fixed?  Do we now support the adapter?

Comment 3 Burr Sutter 2009-10-29 13:38:42 UTC

It is my understanding that there is  "patch" for the JCA adapter and that it is supported at the product-level.  I am not sure if that patch founds its way back into the jboss.org AS stream.   

With that said, do we agree that the HTTP & Socket areas need better/more complete docs at least?