| Summary: | Service Invoker load balance policy that prefers local EPRs | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 4 | Reporter: | niklas käck <niklas.kack> |
| Component: | JBossESB | Assignee: | Nobody <nobody> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 4.3 CP02 | CC: | bperkins |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | FUTURE | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| URL: | http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SOA-1529 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | Type: | Feature Request | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
niklas käck
2009-10-14 07:54:00 UTC
This is not easy to achieve through a load balancer policy, it would require a new registry interceptor. I had thought that InVM was the top priority - stay inside the current JVM when possible. It is if they choose to use it ,but this is for when they want the additional guarantees that a transport such as JMS provides. Approved for SOA 4.3 CP03, but only if resolved by Due Date. Link: Added: This issue depends JBESB-3197 Did not make the cut Draft text for Known Issues section of the Release Notes: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBESB-3197 Currently, there is no service invoker load-balancing policy that prefers local end-point references. This would be of use if users do not want requests to be balanced between different instances in the clutter, as the latter makes debugging harder in the event of a failure. There is no work-around for this lack of functionality. Link: Added: This issue related SOA-2214 See linked issue for registry interceptor addressing this. |