Bug 779748 (SOA-2110)
Summary: | two_servers QS build script doesn't configure the servers properly. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 5 | Reporter: | Marek Baluch <mbaluch> |
Component: | Documentation, JBossESB, Examples | Assignee: | Kevin Conner <kevin.conner> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 5.0.2 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 5.0.2 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
URL: | http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SOA-2110 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-06-18 06:52:02 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Marek Baluch
2010-06-03 09:17:58 UTC
Link: Added: This issue depends JBESB-3339 Re: release notes, we are assuming that since the "Affects Version" is 5.0.2 this didn't affect earlier versions & therefore doesn't need to be included in the release notes If I understand the issue correctly then it occurs because the database is being shared between the two JBM installations, rather than having separate databases as in the original deployment. This change is normal and should already be in the JBM documentation, we will just highlight the necessity within the our readme.txt. Yes. That's exactly the problem. Readme has been updated, will be in the next project tag for the platform. Readme file includes all relevant info. Verified on 5.0.2 CR2. |