Bug 779749 (SOA-2111)

Summary: SOAPElementImpl.getElementsByTagName does not return correct results.
Product: [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 5 Reporter: Marek Baluch <mbaluch>
Component: JBossWSAssignee: Kevin Conner <kevin.conner>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact:
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 5.0.2CC: darran.lofthouse
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SOA-2111
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-06-08 14:50:46 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Marek Baluch 2010-06-04 10:29:35 UTC
Date of First Response: 2010-06-08 10:14:18
project_key: SOA

See linked issue.

Comment 1 Marek Baluch 2010-06-04 10:30:03 UTC
Link: Added: This issue depends JBWS-3055


Comment 2 Marek Baluch 2010-06-04 10:34:25 UTC
Link: Added: This issue related SOA-2112


Comment 3 Darran Lofthouse 2010-06-08 14:10:30 UTC
Link: Added: This issue related JBWS-2703


Comment 4 Darran Lofthouse 2010-06-08 14:10:31 UTC
Link: Added: This issue related JBPAPP-2279


Comment 5 Darran Lofthouse 2010-06-08 14:14:18 UTC
This is related to the two issues JBWS-2703 and JBPAPP-2279.  Initially getElementsByTagName had been incorrectly implemented to return elements based on their local name.

From the getLocalName() javadoc: -

  "Returns the local part of the qualified name of this node. "

From the getTagName() javadoc: -

  "The name of the element. If Node.localName is different from null, this attribute is a qualified name."

So the tagName is a qualified name.



Comment 6 Kevin Conner 2010-06-08 14:19:50 UTC
Darren, if this is now expected behaviour then we should reject this issue and handle it through the ESB codebase (SOA-2112)

Comment 7 Kevin Conner 2010-06-08 14:20:36 UTC
Sorry, last comment directed to Darran.  Apologies for the mistake.

Comment 8 Kevin Conner 2010-06-08 14:50:46 UTC
The WS functionality has been fixed, we now need to fix the ESB side through SOA-2112