Bug 780449

Summary: Refactoring a source model left transformation with mix of old and new model names
Product: [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 5 Reporter: Paul Nittel <pnittel>
Component: Tooling, EDSAssignee: Van Halbert <vhalbert>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: urgent    
Version: JBDSCC: pnittel
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: JBDS   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SOA-2879
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: SOA-2879 Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-11-29 18:50:05 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Paul Nittel 2011-02-07 14:12:17 UTC 
++ This bug is a clone of bug 780448 ++

project_key: SOA

I created a project containing a textfile model, a view model (EatsText) which depends on the textfile model. I then stacked another model (UsesText) on top and added a concat sequence to make a fullname. Saved, executed and it looked good.

Then, I refactored EatsTest to Employees and got a validation error in UsesText. When I looked at the transformation, here's what I found:

SELECT
                EatsText.et.lastName, Employees.et.firstName, Employees.et.middleName, CONCAT2(EatsText.et.lastName, CONCAT2(', ', CONCAT2(EatsText.et.firstName, CONCAT2(' ', LEFT(EatsText.et.middleName, 1))))) AS FullName, Employees.et.empId, Employees.et.department, Employees.et.annualSalary, Employees.et.title, Employees.et.homePhone, Employees.et.mgrId, Employees.et.street, Employees.et.city, Employees.et.state, Employees.et.ZipCode
        FROM
                EatsText.et

It has both the old and refactored names in it. Oddly, the SELECT contains both--I could see where the SELECT could be right and the FROM wrong.
Comment 1 Van Halbert 2011-02-07 14:12:18 UTC 
Link: Added: This issue Cloned from TEIIDDES-817
Comment 2 Van Halbert 2011-02-07 14:12:55 UTC 
Security: Added: Public
Comment 3 Paul Nittel 2011-02-07 17:14:08 UTC 
FYI, I just test-drove a patch and it worked great!
Comment 5 Len DiMaggio 2011-02-08 18:12:42 UTC 
Link: Added: This issue is related to JBDS-1563
Comment 6 Paul Nittel 2011-11-29 18:50:05 UTC 
Tested and closed.