Bug 78106

Summary:	etags should be a package of its own
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Linux	Reporter:	Ben Woodard <woodard>
Component:	xemacs	Assignee:	Jens Petersen <petersen>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Jay Turner <jturner>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	7.3	CC:	srevivo
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2003-05-19 08:40:26 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Ben Woodard 2002-11-19 04:37:11 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003

Description of problem:
You should either include etags with xemacs or make etags a package of its own.
The way that it is now, even if you only use xemacs if you need etags, you have
to install emacs.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.don't install emacs
2.install xemacs
3.try to run etags
	

Actual Results:  command not found

Expected Results:  etags runs.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jens Petersen 2002-11-28 05:53:49 UTC

*** Bug 78668 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Jens Petersen 2002-11-28 05:58:53 UTC

Thanks for reminding me about this. :)

BTW ctags is actually a separate upstream package.

What I'm thinking now, is for the time being at least is to ship etags with
XEmacs named as etags.xemacs, and symlink it to etags at install time if 
there is no etags installed.  Perhaps I will do the same with Emacs later.
Then alternatives could also be used to choose one or the other when both
are installed.

Comment 3 Jens Petersen 2002-11-28 06:00:53 UTC

(moving to xemacs component)

Comment 4 Jens Petersen 2002-12-23 17:04:49 UTC

xemacs-21.4.10-5 should have etags.emacs.
Please confirm.

Comment 5 Ben Woodard 2002-12-23 17:22:09 UTC

I'd say yes. Please either include etags with xemacs or make an additional
package which has etags from emacs in it and allow it to be installed seperately.

-ben

Comment 6 Jens Petersen 2003-01-02 00:18:06 UTC

I mean it includes "/usr/bin/etags.xemacs".