Bug 781627

Summary: pushed providers builds hidden by 'Some images not pushed'
Product: [Retired] CloudForms Cloud Engine Reporter: Dave Johnson <dajohnso>
Component: aeolus-conductorAssignee: Imre Farkas <ifarkas>
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME QA Contact: wes hayutin <whayutin>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 1.0.0CC: akarol, athomas, cpelland, deltacloud-maint, hbrock, imcleod, ssachdev
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-02-03 14:31:47 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 744194    
Attachments:
Description Flags
ss
none
after, real status is hidden none

Description Dave Johnson 2012-01-13 21:28:14 UTC 
Description of problem:
=================================
After 'build(ing) missing' provider images, the ui flips the status of all builds, regardless of whether they actually have been successfully pushed. All builds get a 'Some of the images are not pushed' which seems kind of weird.  I am guessing this is by choice but figured it would be good to get some clarification on this.  

1.  Setup conductor and configure for multiple providers.  
2.  Add a single provider account and build and push a image.  
3.  Add one or two more provider accounts.
4.  Notice that after 'build missing' completes, all provider builds flip to 'Some images not pushed' instead of just updating the provider(s) which do not have builds pushed.
Comment 1 Dave Johnson 2012-01-13 21:29:32 UTC 
Created attachment 555150 [details]
ss

Before (I actually had both rhevm builds pushed, this was a older screenshot)
Comment 2 Dave Johnson 2012-01-13 21:30:09 UTC 
Created attachment 555151 [details]
after, real status is hidden
Comment 3 wes hayutin 2012-01-24 16:46:26 UTC 
QE thinks factory log and conductor should have the same names used for build/push status
Comment 4 Imre Farkas 2012-01-24 17:01:06 UTC 
I can't replicate this on the current 1.0-staging branch with the steps described in Comment 1. If you can, could you specify how?
Comment 5 Dave Johnson 2012-02-03 14:31:47 UTC 
Spent some time on this yesterday and was unable to reproduce, closing this out for now.