| Summary: | new version of libevent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Christopher Meng <i> |
| Component: | libevent | Assignee: | Steve Dickson <steved> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | qe-baseos-daemons |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 6.3 | CC: | rwheeler |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-02-06 15:27:02 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Christopher Meng
2012-01-16 02:58:25 UTC
(In reply to comment #0) > see it at here:http://www.wangafu.net/~nickm/libevent-2.0/doxygen/html Why do we need to this new version? We don't normally rebase libraries in a given RHEL release family since that has a cascading impact on all users of the library. This is much more appropriate to do in the next major release. Christopher, if you are a partner or a customer, you should raise this kind of request through official channels with Red Hat support or your partner interface. Bugzilla is not the correct tool to ask for end user feature requests. Thanks! |