Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 781981

Summary: libvirt should show some error when start the guest which disk's dev and bus is not fit
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Huang Wenlong <whuang>
Component: libvirtAssignee: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.3CC: acathrow, cwei, dallan, gsun, mzhan, rwu, tzheng, weizhan
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-01-17 21:04:16 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Huang Wenlong 2012-01-16 09:07:13 UTC
Description of problem:
libvirt should show some error  when start the guest which  disk's dev and bus is not fit

<target dev='hda' bus='virtio'/> and <target dev='vdb' bus='ide'/>


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libvirt-0.9.9-1.el6.x86_64

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. edit guest's xml
#virsh edit $guest

disk like this :
<target dev='hda' bus='virtio'/> or <target dev='vda' bus='ide'/>

2. start the guest
#virsh start q2
Domain q2 started

3. no error or warning
# virsh dumpxml q2

...
<disk type='file' device='disk'>
<driver name='qemu' type='qcow2' cache='none'/>
<source file='/var/lib/libvirt/images/q2.img'/>
<target dev='hda' bus='virtio'/>
<alias name='virtio-disk0'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x04' function='0x0'/>
</disk>
...

in the guest

disk is  /dev/vda


Actual results:
not fit but no check

Expected results:
show some message when disk dev and bus is not fit

Additional info:

Comment 3 Jiri Denemark 2012-01-17 21:04:16 UTC
I don't really think this is worth fixing. Target dev doesn't really mean anything, it is merely used to easily identify the device (when using virsh commands, for example) and for sorting devices on the same bus. This is also explicitly mentioned in domain XML documentation. Target dev doesn't have to match the in-guest device name and if you run any BSD system or even Windows as a guest, the in-guest device name will not be even close to target dev. Actually since libata started to include drivers for IDE controles, the correspondence doesn't work in Linux either (<target dev='hdc' bus='ide'/> will most likely be /dev/sr0 in a guest). Not to mention that one can rename the devices easily with udev.

In other words, I don't think we should pretend there's something special about target dev and enforce unnecessary relation between dev and bus.

Comment 4 Dave Allan 2012-01-17 21:15:37 UTC
Agreed; sometimes I wish that we hadn't even included the target dev, since it's really quite meaningless.