Bug 782885

Summary: [RFE] allow setting password when adding user
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Dmitri Pal <dpal>
Component: ipaAssignee: Rob Crittenden <rcritten>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: IDM QE LIST <seceng-idm-qe-list>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.3CC: jgalipea, mkosek, pvoborni
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: ipa-2.2.0-1.el6 Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
No documentation needed.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-20 13:29:26 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Dmitri Pal 2012-01-18 19:27:37 UTC
This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/1646

While password is not a required field, a user account is not usable without a password for the vast majority of the use-cases.  The add user dialog box should allow the setting of the user's password.

Design considerations:

 1. It should be optional. 
 2. It should allow the end user to opt to show clear text passwords.  
 3. These two decision should persist if the user chooses "add and add another" for adding a large number of users.
 4. If the user does not show clear text passwords, they should have to type the password twice.  Form validation should report if the two field values are different at each keystroke.

Comment 1 Dmitri Pal 2012-01-18 20:25:47 UTC
*** Bug 782887 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Martin Kosek 2012-01-19 09:48:31 UTC
Fixed upstream:

master: 555b13b9aad6d6a174900e89f2ac95c2aa55432b

Comment 4 Jenny Severance 2012-04-17 20:07:41 UTC
Automated coverage for this enhancement is complete - feature exists ... closing verified

Comment 5 Petr Vobornik 2012-04-24 12:19:52 UTC
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
No documentation needed.

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 13:29:26 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0819.html