Bug 783101

Summary: Exchange the ON and OFF images for providers
Product: [Retired] CloudForms Cloud Engine Reporter: Shveta <ssachdev>
Component: aeolus-conductorAssignee: Ken Keiter <kenkeiter>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: wes hayutin <whayutin>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 1.0.0CC: akarol, athomas, deltacloud-maint, ssachdev
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-01-25 16:37:48 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
offandon none

Description Shveta 2012-01-19 10:58:03 UTC
Created attachment 556250 [details]
offandon

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce: 
1.  When a provider is enabled or ON , the image shown in ON (Green) with a radio button to turn it off
2. I think more user friendly will be showing OFF image with a radio button so that  user knows that to turn the provider OFF , click here.
3. Similarly , when the provider is OFF , we should show ON image with the button to turn it ON 
  


In the attached screenshot provider is OFF , to turn it ON we should show the ON image (Green one) 
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

rpm -qa|grep aeolus
aeolus-conductor-0.8.0-8.el6.noarch
aeolus-conductor-daemons-0.8.0-8.el6.noarch
rubygem-aeolus-image-0.3.0-3.el6.noarch
rubygem-aeolus-cli-0.3.0-4.el6.noarch
aeolus-all-0.8.0-8.el6.noarch
aeolus-configure-2.5.0-5.el6.noarch
aeolus-conductor-doc-0.8.0-8.el6.noarch

Comment 1 Angus Thomas 2012-01-19 11:58:01 UTC
Umm... I'm not a usability expert, but the fact that the slider says "Off" when the provider is off feels pretty intuitive to me.

The opposite behaviour, where the slider read "On" when the provider was off would, I think, be counter-intuitive.

Passing this over to Ken for a designer's view.

Comment 2 wes hayutin 2012-01-19 13:39:31 UTC
I think the design looks good in its current form, and users will find it easy to use.  Unless Ken wants to change the design, my vote is to close this particular issue.

I understand Shveta's point of view, but on this rare occasion I am going to disagree.

Comment 3 wes hayutin 2012-01-25 16:37:48 UTC
closing not a bug