Bug 783242
Summary: | service httpd reload return 0 when it fails | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Aleš Mareček <amarecek> |
Component: | httpd | Assignee: | Joe Orton <jorton> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Aleš Mareček <amarecek> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 5.9 | CC: | bsingh, emaldona, mharmsen, prc, pyaduvan |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | httpd-2.2.3-67.el5 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-01-08 05:04:06 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 713373 |
Description
Aleš Mareček
2012-01-19 18:28:39 UTC
LSB compliance fixes were done in RHEL6 per bug 546252, which include this fix; we can backport some/all of those as required. Hi Joe, I know it was fixed in RHEL-6. I also know there are no plans for LSB in RHEL-5 but if it's possible it will be nice to have this function (these functions) fixed. I wonder why PM didn't endorse LSB for RHEL-5, it's part of that distribution, and it's recommended to use it. Thanks and Regards! This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in a release. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0130.html |