Bug 783362

Summary:	The grub are different between auto and interactive install.
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	cshao <cshao>
Component:	ovirt-node	Assignee:	Mike Burns <mburns>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	6.2	CC:	acathrow, bsarathy, gouyang, jboggs, leiwang, mburns, moli, ovirt-maint, sgordon, ycui
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	TestOnly
Target Release:	6.2
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-07-19 14:17:58 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description cshao 2012-01-20 06:18:26 UTC

Description of problem:
The grub are different between auto and interactive install.

Auto grub shows: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Hypervisor (6.2-20120119.1.el6_2)

Interactive grub shows: RHEV Hypervisor 6.2-20120119.1.el6_2

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rhev-hypervisor6-6.2-20120119.1.el6_2

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Auto install RHEV-H.
2. Interactive install RHEV-H.
3. Check grub.
  
Actual results:
Auto grub shows: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Hypervisor (6.2-20120119.1.el6_2)

Interactive grub shows: RHEV Hypervisor 6.2-20120119.1.el6_2

Expected results:
The grub should keep same format between auto and interactive install.

Additional info:

Comment 2 Mike Burns 2012-01-20 13:51:13 UTC

Not truly z-stream worthy and 6.3 will be rebased to upstream where we use the same code to both autoinstall and tui install.

Comment 4 Stephen Gordon 2012-03-28 19:20:12 UTC

    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
-- no tech note needed

Comment 7 Stephen Gordon 2012-06-15 13:57:53 UTC

Deleted Technical Notes Contents.

Old Contents:
-- no tech note needed

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2012-07-19 14:17:58 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0741.html