Bug 783481
Summary: | icu fails in rawhide with gcc 4.7.0 mass rebuild | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Peter Robinson <pbrobinson> |
Component: | gcc | Assignee: | Jakub Jelinek <jakub> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | denis.arnaud_fedora, erack, jakub |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | gcc-4.7.0-0.9.fc17 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-01-24 07:37:56 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Peter Robinson
2012-01-20 15:21:12 UTC
assigning to gcc as likely a gcc issue That needs analysis by the package maintainer first. It might be a GCC issue, but it might also be (and more probably) just package bug, strict aliasing violation, undefined behavior code etc. If you suspect a gcc bug, it needs to be first reduced into a small self-contained reproducer. Thanks. (In reply to comment #0) > icu 4.8.1 previously built fine @pbrobinson: I noticed you updated the ICU to version 4.8.1.1, did this package actually build with other gcc versions? (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #0) > > icu 4.8.1 previously built fine > > @pbrobinson: I noticed you updated the ICU to version 4.8.1.1, did this package > actually build with other gcc versions? Scratch build on f16 builds fine http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3719806 This turned to be a GCC bug, icu/source/test/cintltst/cbiditst.c u16ToPseudo function is miscompiled. But next time I'd really appreciate if at least the binary search (if doing brute force search) would be done by package maintainers who know their code better than me. |