Bug 784027
Summary: | cannot load rdflib on EL-6 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Matěj Cepl <mcepl> |
Component: | python-rdflib | Assignee: | Dave Malcolm <dmalcolm> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | el6 | CC: | devurandom, dmalcolm, jlaska, mcepl, pingou |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | python-rdflib-3.2.0-1.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-02-21 16:52:52 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 784029 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Matěj Cepl
2012-01-23 15:46:20 UTC
If python-rdflib requires python-isodate, shouldn't we have a Requires: python-isodate in the rdflib spec? python-rdflib-3.2.0-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-0190/python-rdflib-3.2.0-1.el6 python-rdflib-3.2.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. I am not sure what is going on here, but I still get:
Python 2.6.6 (r266:84292, Jan 4 2012, 16:09:28)
[GCC 4.4.6 20110731 (Red Hat 4.4.6-3)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import rdflib
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/rdflib/__init__.py", line 65, in <module>
from rdflib.term import URIRef, BNode, Literal, Variable
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/rdflib/term.py", line 49, in <module>
from isodate import parse_time, parse_date, parse_datetime
ImportError: No module named isodate
# rpm -qf /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/rdflib/term.py
python-rdflib-3.2.0-1.el6.noarch
Name : python-rdflib
Arch : noarch
Version : 3.2.0
Release : 1.el6
Size : 1.0 M
Repo : installed
From repo : epel
Committer : Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou>
Committime : Fri Jan 20 13:00:00 2012
Buildtime : Fri Jan 20 10:50:19 2012
Install time: Thu Mar 22 22:04:02 2012
python-rdflib-3.2.0-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-rdflib-3.2.0-2.el6 For some reasons I mixed up this, just pushed a new release that should fix this. Ah, now I see what happened. 3.2.0-1 was pushed in February, but -3 fixes the issue, as your commit points out. In that case pushing -2 today was still not enough, as -3 is needed (see [1]). [1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=python-rdflib.git;a=commitdiff;h=7584bd6ab75f81a8c8a73915c88c8dde996b7079 python-rdflib-3.2.0-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. (In reply to comment #9) > python-rdflib-3.2.0-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable > repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug > report. You are right, I looked at the wrong branch of the python-rdflib git repository (master instead of el6). In that case -2 [1] should indeed fix it. Thanks! P.S: Fixed-in-version should be updated to -2. [1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=python-rdflib.git;a=commitdiff;h=90b148b3bb2a6a86aebcb95165972ceafef65410 |