| Summary: | gupnp-dlna lacks gobject-introspection | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Roman Kagan <rkagan> |
| Component: | gupnp-dlna | Assignee: | Peter Robinson <pbrobinson> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 16 | CC: | pbrobinson, zeenix |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | gupnp-dlna-0.6.4-3.fc16 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-02-02 17:28:34 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
gupnp-dlna-0.6.4-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gupnp-dlna-0.6.4-3.fc16 Package gupnp-dlna-0.6.4-3.fc16: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing gupnp-dlna-0.6.4-3.fc16' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0863/gupnp-dlna-0.6.4-3.fc16 then log in and leave karma (feedback). Although this update technically resulted in a .gir in the repository, it doesn't work as designed because it defines "GUPnP" namespace thus conflicting with .gir of gupnp package. This is an upstream bug and strictly speaking a separate issue, but without it the package doesn't work (and in my case it even hid the original GUPnP namespace so it might break someone's code using GUPnP via g-ir). Should I file a separate bug for that? yes, will need a bug at bugzilla.gnome.org as its a source code bug not a distribution bug so needs to be tracked there. Feel free to update this ticket with the details of that bug number though Upstream bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=668606 My question was rather if I should better file a separate bug in RedHat bugzilla? you could but it would just get fixed once upstream push out a fixed release gupnp-dlna-0.6.4-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |
Description of problem: gupnp-dlna is missing gobject-introspection stuff. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): gupnp-dlna-0.6.4-1.fc16.{x86_64,i686} Steps to Reproduce: 1.rpm -ql gupnp-dlna | grep -F girepository Actual results: no typelib file Expected results: GUPnPDLNA-*.typelib in /usr/lib*/girepository-1.0 Additional info: AFAICT this happened due to missing gobject-introspection-devel buildreq.