Bug 784133

Summary: In correct error message in case of domain name collisions
Product: OKD Reporter: Nam Duong <nduong>
Component: ocAssignee: Alex Boone <aboone>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: libra bugs <libra-bugs>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 2.xCC: jofernan
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-01-23 22:24:39 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Nam Duong 2012-01-23 22:10:41 UTC
Description of problem:
This was reported by an end user (very specific use case - might sound like a subcase of bug# 783524:
_________________
I've tried to create a domain a few times, but at this point I get the following:


    [israel@nexus] $ rhc-create-domain -n exsolent -l bruce.israel
    Password: 
    OpenShift Express key found at /home/israel/.ssh/libra_id_rsa.  Reusing...
    Problem reported from server. Response code was 400.
    Re-run with -d for more information.

    RESULT:
    A user with RHLogin 'bruce.israel' already exists


which is a very bad error for a domain creation command.  So I registered a second email, and now I get this:

    [israel@nexus] $ rhc-create-domain -n exsolent -l bnisrael
    Password: 
    OpenShift Express key found at /home/israel/.ssh/libra_id_rsa.  Reusing...
    Problem reported from server. Response code was 500.
    Re-run with -d for more information.

    RESULT:
    Error communicating with DNS system.  If the problem persists please contact Red Hat support.


which I have been getting most of the weekend, on the other account as well.
_________________
Summary:  The user tried creating a domain with the same name using 2 different Logins.  We should have thrown the correct error message.

Version:  In production now (I believe 0.84.15)

Comment 1 Nam Duong 2012-01-23 22:24:39 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 783524 ***