| Summary: | Are current codecs legally unencumbered? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | vvs <vvs009> |
| Component: | totem | Assignee: | Bastien Nocera <bnocera> |
| Status: | CLOSED CANTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 16 | CC: | bnocera |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-01-27 06:28:22 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
vvs
2012-01-25 11:02:34 UTC
Guess that I was wrong about youtube. It was actually WebM/Vorbis codec, but wasn't easy to verify. Still if these codecs are really not there why it is reported as if they are? (In reply to comment #1) > Guess that I was wrong about youtube. It was actually WebM/Vorbis codec, but > wasn't easy to verify. Still if these codecs are really not there why it is > reported as if they are? Because the NPAPI plugin API doesn't allow for finer-grained advertisement of features, and mime-types are especially badly designed to advertise video and audio codecs, as they only represent the containers. |