| Summary: | A cache started over JMX does not appear among caches in the JMX view | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [JBoss] JBoss Data Grid 6 | Reporter: | Martin Gencur <mgencur> | ||||
| Component: | Server | Assignee: | Tristan Tarrant <ttarrant> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 6.0.0 | CC: | jawilson, jdg-bugs, myarboro | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | 6.0.0 | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2012-03-29 12:03:38 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Martin Gencur
2012-01-27 10:02:38 UTC
Created attachment 557835 [details]
JConsole screenshot of the problem
The attached image shows that there are only 2 caches in the view while there are more caches running (I started a few caches over JMX and they did not appear in the view).
And one more thing...this is a regression that happened sometime during last month, this worked fine with EDG in December. Does this still happen ? Does this still happen ? Yes. Tested with ER2. I think we should disallow starting/stopping caches via JMX in server mode, as this is handled directly by Infinispan and not by the Infinispan subsystem. The Infinispan subsystem associates a service for each container and cache, and starting/stopping the cache via JMX will not start/stop the corresponding service. I think I agree with Tristan's comments above in that server mode users shouldn't be doing this. What about library mode, however? Tristan, can you elaborate on what disallow means? Do you mean "not support" as in support policy or "prevent" as in a code change? Library should work fine. Code change would mean producing separate Infinispan libraries so I'd rather go with "not support". WDYT ? |