Bug 785741

Summary:	sssd.api.conf and sssd.api.d should not be in /etc
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh>
Component:	sssd	Assignee:	Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	IDM QE LIST <seceng-idm-qe-list>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.3	CC:	apeetham, grajaiya, jgalipea, prc
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	sssd-1.8.0-2.el6.beta2	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	No technical note required	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-06-20 11:54:11 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Stephen Gallagher 2012-01-30 14:00:34 UTC

This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1158

/etc is intended for user-editable configuration files. sssd.api.* is more properly classified as a data file, and as such should be located in /usr/share/sssd (as defined by the [http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRSHAREARCHITECTUREINDEPENDENTDATA Filesystem Hierarchy Standard])

Comment 3 Stephen Gallagher 2012-04-10 16:51:42 UTC

    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
No technical note required

Comment 4 Amith 2012-05-02 22:30:55 UTC

Verified the bug on sssd-1.8.0-22.el6.x86_64. File "sssd.api.conf" and directory "sssd.api.d" is currently located at directory /usr/share/sssd/

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 11:54:11 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0747.html