Bug 786228

Summary: %{_libdir}/xulrunner-2/libxul.so is truncated
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Michel Alexandre Salim <michel>
Component: xulrunnerAssignee: Martin Stransky <stransky>
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: gecko-bugs-nobody, johnp, jrb, stransky, walters
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-12-21 13:52:47 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Michel Alexandre Salim 2012-01-31 18:49:30 UTC
Description of problem:
If xulrunner is installed, every time ldconfig is triggered I get this warning:

 ldconfig: file /usr/lib64/xulrunner-2/libxul.so;4f25a0c5 is truncated

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
xulrunner-9.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64 -- on Rawhide's usrmove repo

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install xulrunner
2. ldconfig, or install another package that trigger ldconfig
  
Actual results:
The given warning is triggered on both steps 1 and 2

Expected results:
No warning

Additional info:

Comment 1 Martin Stransky 2012-02-24 15:05:47 UTC
Do you still see it?

Comment 2 Michel Alexandre Salim 2012-02-25 09:14:40 UTC
I just tried doing an 'ldconfig' and didn't see it anymore. Not sure when it stopped though.

Comment 3 Martin Stransky 2012-02-27 07:35:32 UTC
Okay, Thanks.

Comment 4 Michel Alexandre Salim 2012-03-02 02:01:48 UTC
And the problem is back:

✗ sudo ldconfig
[sudo] password for michel: 
ldconfig: file /usr/lib64/xulrunner-2/libxul.so;4f25a0c5 is truncated

✗ rpm -V xulrunner
✗ rpm -q xulrunner
xulrunner-10.0.1-3.fc17.x86_64
✗ rpm -qf $(which ldconfig)
glibc-2.15-23.fc17.x86_64
glibc-2.15-23.fc17.i686

Comment 5 Martin Stransky 2012-03-02 06:56:32 UTC
I wonder if prelink is involved here.

Comment 6 Michel Alexandre Salim 2012-03-03 05:21:29 UTC
Any way I can test that, while I can still reproduce the bug?

Comment 7 Martin Stransky 2012-12-21 13:52:47 UTC
Still uble to reproduce. Please reopen if you see it again.