| Summary: | [abrt] evolution-3.2.3-1.fc16: __GI_raise: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Daniel <daniel.distler> | ||||||||||
| Component: | evolution | Assignee: | Matthew Barnes <mbarnes> | ||||||||||
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||||||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||||||
| Version: | 16 | CC: | lucilanga, mbarnes, mcrha | ||||||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened | ||||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | abrt_hash:37f0b2ab0b8b01272d0fa47c3179a067fcae93d1 | ||||||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2012-02-06 12:15:46 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||||
|
Description
Daniel
2012-02-05 10:08:55 UTC
Created attachment 559454 [details]
File: dso_list
Created attachment 559455 [details]
File: build_ids
Created attachment 559456 [details]
File: maps
Created attachment 559457 [details]
File: backtrace
Thanks for a bug report. There had been reported a similar bug report already, thus I'm marking it as a duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 773691 *** thanks for your prompt feedback, but I don't see the similarity. While the function imapx_job_scan_changes_done from bug 773691 is somewhere in my back trace, it is in the BT of thread 2, while the call to __GI_raise is in thread 1. The signal in bug 773691 is SIGSEGV, while here it is SIGABRT. different threads + different signals => different bug? (In reply to comment #6) > different threads + different signals => different bug? Yes and no. In other words: it depends. Thread numbering is kinda different with ABRT, as Thread 1 doesn't mean thread where the main loop is run, but thread where the crash had been catch. If you look carefully, then Thread 2 is in > malloc_printerr (action=3, str=0x3e2cf71b4c "corrupted double-linked list", > ptr=<optimized out>) which means there is something wrong in memory. Thread 1 recognized it too, and decided to abort, sooner than Thread 2. Thread 2 is in imapx_job_scan_changes_done(). Bug #773691 is about memory corruption being recognized around the same function, imapx_job_scan_changes_done(). As memory corruption likes to do, it can cause a crash sooner or later, and in your case it's rather later. The above is a reason why I believe these two are same issue. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 773691 *** You are right. I should have looked more thoroughly. Thanks for the feedback and sorry for the noise! |