| Summary: | Document RRP configuration through ccs command in 6.4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Steven J. Levine <slevine> |
| Component: | doc-Cluster_Administration | Assignee: | Steven J. Levine <slevine> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | ecs-bugs |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 6.3 | CC: | cfeist, fdinitto, lhh, slevine |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Documentation |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-02-25 18:31:40 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Steven J. Levine
2012-02-08 16:52:03 UTC
Moving this to RHEL 6.4, as per Sayan's instructions: Let's not document RRP now. We'll will work with our one customer to teach them how to use it. Sayan On 03/13/2012 12:11 PM, Steven Levine wrote: > At this point, based on my understanding of where RRP support stands, I > would like to confirm and clarify the documentation plans for how to > address (or not address) this feature in RHEL 6.3. > > Although there are 2 components to this feature (corosync and DLM over > SCTP), my understanding after talking with Dave Teigland is that you > would really need to use both components for the feature to be useful. > This would mean that even if the corosync aspect is supported, if the > DLM over SCTP aspect is in technical preview then RRP support as a whole > would remain in technical preview. Is that correct? > > Or, specifically, do I document RRP configuration (with luci, ccs, and > the cluster.conf file) in RHEL 6.3? > > In the past, in cluster documentation, we have not documented features > in tech. preview in the regular documentation. Those features are > documented in the release notes and called out as being in technical > preview, but once they are in the regular documentation set on > redhat.com they imply some level of promise that there will be full > support in the next (or a near future) release. Those released documents > have a life of their own. It seems a bad idea to document a > not-yet-supported feature that we may withdraw, in the standard document > set. > > So even though Conga in 6.3 shows a configuration screen for RRP > components, and the ccs command supports this as well, I am currently > thinking that I should not call out this feature in the 6.3 Cluster > Administration document (or suggest that John Ha add an overview of the > feature to the HA Add-On Overview). > > Does this make sense? > > -Steven > > > > > > > > > > > > |