Bug 788725

Summary:	filter normalization does not use matching rules
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Rich Megginson <rmeggins>
Component:	389-ds-base	Assignee:	Rich Megginson <rmeggins>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	IDM QE LIST <seceng-idm-qe-list>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.3	CC:	amsharma, jgalipea, nkinder
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	389-ds-base-1.2.10.0-1.el6	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	Cause: Attempting to perform a search on an attribute that is defined with a matching rule that uses a different comparison than the default comparison for the attributes syntax. Consequence: Searches do not work properly. Fix: Use a matching rule sensitive normalization on filter attributes and values. Result: Searches return matching rule valid results.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-06-20 07:13:26 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Rich Megginson 2012-02-08 22:02:11 UTC

This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/279

If you have an attribute with Directory String syntax defined with caseExact matching rules, and a value with upper case letters, a search will not find the value because the search filter will be normalized using the default normalization for the syntax instead of being aware of the matching rule.  value normalization must take into account the matching rule used.

Comment 1 Nathan Kinder 2012-02-13 21:46:42 UTC

Verification of this should already be covered by the acceptance tests.

Comment 3 Amita Sharma 2012-05-07 11:08:56 UTC

filter tet suit is passing 100%.
Hence marking this bug as VERIFIED.

Comment 4 Rich Megginson 2012-05-18 15:13:08 UTC

clearing needinfo

Comment 5 Rich Megginson 2012-05-24 23:24:32 UTC

    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
Cause: Attempting to perform a search on an attribute that is defined with a matching rule that uses a different comparison than the default comparison for the attributes syntax.
Consequence: Searches do not work properly.
Fix: Use a matching rule sensitive normalization on filter attributes and values.
Result: Searches return matching rule valid results.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 07:13:26 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0813.html