Bug 789007

Summary: Migrate with normal user (non org admin) user .
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: spandey
Component: subscription-managerAssignee: Alex Wood <awood>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Entitlement Bugs <entitlement-bugs>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.3CC: awood, jmolet, jsefler, kbanerje, mstead, skallesh, spandey
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 805611 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-20 13:05:31 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 738066, 805611    

Description spandey 2012-02-09 15:07:34 UTC
Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
3/3

Prerequisite:
Rhel5.8 with following rpm 
subscription-manager-migration-0.98.14-1.el5
subscription-manager-0.98.14-1.el5
subscription-manager-migration-data-1.11-1.el5

Steps to Repro   : 

Register client to rhn_classic using normal user account.
Migrate from classic to rhsm.

Expected Result : 
It should not display traceback .
Proper Message should display like “User do not have premission to migrate from rhn_classic to rhsm”.
Migration facts should not generated for incomplete migration process .

Comment 1 Alex Wood 2012-03-16 19:21:08 UTC
Could you paste in the traceback?

I'm not able to duplicate this issue.  For me, the script outputs "Must be root user to execute" and exits.

Comment 2 spandey 2012-03-19 11:08:31 UTC
# /usr/sbin/rhn-migrate-classic-to-rhsm 
RHN Username: rhn-support-bmumbaik
Password: 
Retrieving existing RHN classic subscription information ...
+----------------------------------+
System is currently subscribed to:
+----------------------------------+
rhel-i386-server-5
List of channels for which certs are being copied
rhel-i386-server-5
Product Certificates copied successfully to /tmp/rhsm !!
Preparing to unregister system from RHN classic ...
Problem encountered unregistering system from RHN Classic.  Exiting
Following traceback found in /var/log/rhsm/rhsm.log:
2012-02-09 00:34:38,206 [INFO]  @rhn-migrate-classic-to-rhsm:161 - Deleting system 1021946626 from RHN Classic...
2012-02-09 00:34:41,268 [ERROR]  @rhn-migrate-classic-to-rhsm:176 - Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/sbin/rhn-migrate-classic-to-rhsm", line 167, in unRegisterSystemFromRhnClassic
    result = sc.system.deleteSystems(sk, systemId)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/xmlrpclib.py", line 1096, in __call__
    return self.__send(self.__name, args)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/xmlrpclib.py", line 1383, in __request
    verbose=self.__verbose
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/xmlrpclib.py", line 1147, in request
    return self._parse_response(h.getfile(), sock)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/xmlrpclib.py", line 1286, in _parse_response
    return u.close()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/xmlrpclib.py", line 744, in close
    raise Fault(**self._stack[0])
Fault: <Fault 1003: 'The following systems were NOT deleted: \n1021946626'>

Comment 3 spandey 2012-03-19 11:09:24 UTC
Above is the traceback we find while testing

Comment 4 Alex Wood 2012-03-20 19:36:53 UTC
Committed bb4dfbb5479adeba5b9ca48e5077bf261d6c8e81

subscription-manager-0.99.11+

Comment 6 spandey 2012-03-22 09:26:48 UTC
verified Using following rpm :
 
subscription-manager-gnome-0.99.10-1.git.91.da82449.el6.x86_64
subscription-manager-migration-0.99.10-1.git.91.da82449.el6.x86_64
subscription-manager-migration-data-1.12.1.1-1.git.6.ea6813e.el6.noarch
subscription-manager-firstboot-0.99.10-1.git.91.da82449.el6.x86_64
subscription-manager-0.99.10-1.git.91.da82449.el6.x86_64


Migrate using non admin user got following message on console  

"You must be an org admin to successfully run this script."

Resolving defect as verified.

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 13:05:31 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0804.html