Bug 789360
Summary: | Review Request: rfcdiff - Compares two internet draft files and outputs the difference | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Richard Shaw <hobbes1069> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Matthias Runge <mrunge> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | mrunge, notting, package-review |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | mrunge:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | rfcdiff-1.41-2.fc16 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-03-06 20:47:28 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Richard Shaw
2012-02-10 15:21:08 UTC
I'll take this one. Just some small notes prior formal review: during mockbuild, I get the following error: + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + make manpage ./rfcdiff --help | txt2man -t "rfcdiff 1" > rfcdiff.1 /bin/sh: txt2man: command not found make: *** [rfcdiff.1] Error 127 rm rfcdiff.1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JYm0b4 (%build) Seems like txt2man is not marked as BuildRequirement. Could you please try to resolve the rpmlint-error E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/rfcdiff-1.41/copyright (this normally requires upstream to correct copyright)? (In reply to comment #2) > Just some small notes prior formal review: > > during mockbuild, I get the following error: > > + export LANG > + unset DISPLAY > + make manpage > ./rfcdiff --help | txt2man -t "rfcdiff 1" > rfcdiff.1 > /bin/sh: txt2man: command not found > make: *** [rfcdiff.1] Error 127 > rm rfcdiff.1 > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JYm0b4 (%build) > > Seems like txt2man is not marked as BuildRequirement. > > Could you please try to resolve the rpmlint-error Fixed! > E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/rfcdiff-1.41/copyright > > (this normally requires upstream to correct copyright)? Yes, we're not allowed to patch license files. I'll report upstream. Spec URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.spec SRPM URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/rfcdiff/rfcdiff-1.41-2.fc16.src.rpm Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Pass ! = Fail ? = Not evaluated ==== Generic ==== [x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: MUST Buildroot is not present Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine [x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries. [x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required [x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5 [x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags. [x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required [x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: MUST Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: MUST Package does not generates any conflict. [x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: MUST Package installs properly. [x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary. [!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent. rpmlint rfcdiff-1.41-2.fc18.noarch.rpm rfcdiff.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html -> HTML, ht ml, ht-ml rfcdiff.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wdiff -> diff, whiff, w diff rfcdiff.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US changebars -> change bars, change-bars, changers rfcdiff.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/rfcdiff-1.41/copyright rfcdiff.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/rfcdiff-1.41/todo 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings. rpmlint rfcdiff-1.41-2.fc18.src.rpm rfcdiff.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html -> HTML, ht ml, ht-ml rfcdiff.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wdiff -> diff, whiff, w diff rfcdiff.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US changebars -> change bars, change-bars, changers 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. [x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. /home/mrunge/789360/rfcdiff-1.41.tgz : MD5SUM this package : f480e4a571aa39f8e3e788f771568ca8 MD5SUM upstream package : f480e4a571aa39f8e3e788f771568ca8 [x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one. [x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [ ]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present. [x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q --requires). [x]: SHOULD Package functions as described. [x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL. [x]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define. Issues: [!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent. rpmlint rfcdiff-1.41-2.fc18.noarch.rpm rfcdiff.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html -> HTML, ht ml, ht-ml rfcdiff.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wdiff -> diff, whiff, w diff rfcdiff.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US changebars -> change bars, change-bars, changers rfcdiff.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/rfcdiff-1.41/copyright rfcdiff.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/rfcdiff-1.41/todo 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings. rpmlint rfcdiff-1.41-2.fc18.src.rpm rfcdiff.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html -> HTML, ht ml, ht-ml rfcdiff.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wdiff -> diff, whiff, w diff rfcdiff.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US changebars -> change bars, change-bars, changers 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. I see no blocker, you should remove the empty file and try to get upstream to correct fsf-address. Package APPROVED New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: rfcdiff Short Description: Compares two internet draft files and outputs the difference Owners: hobbes1069 Branches: f16 f17 InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). Thanks for the review! rfcdiff-1.41-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rfcdiff-1.41-2.fc16 rfcdiff-1.41-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rfcdiff-1.41-2.fc17 rfcdiff-1.41-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. rfcdiff-1.41-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. rfcdiff-1.41-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. rfcdiff-1.41-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. |