Bug 789402

Summary:	mesa 8.0 on ARM missing drivers
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Peter Robinson <pbrobinson>
Component:	mesa	Assignee:	Adam Jackson <ajax>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	ajax
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-02-13 17:28:28 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	245418

Description Peter Robinson 2012-02-10 17:17:12 UTC

The mesa 8.0 snapshot seems to compile OK on ARM but it appears to be missing most (all?) of the HW drivers. I can't see anything obvious as to why they're missing with an initial look.

http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/taskinfo?taskID=374063


RPM build errors:
File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/mesa-8.0-0.1.fc17.arm/usr/lib/dri/nouveau_vieux_dri.so
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/mesa-8.0-0.1.fc17.arm/usr/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/mesa-8.0-0.1.fc17.arm/usr/lib/dri/radeon_dri.so
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/mesa-8.0-0.1.fc17.arm/usr/lib/dri/r200_dri.so
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/mesa-8.0-0.1.fc17.arm/usr/lib/dri/r300_dri.so
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/mesa-8.0-0.1.fc17.arm/usr/lib/dri/r600_dri.so
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/mesa-8.0-0.1.fc17.arm/usr/lib/dri/nouveau_dri.so
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/mesa-8.0-0.1.fc17.arm/usr/lib/dri/nouveau_vieux_dri.so
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/mesa-8.0-0.1.fc17.arm/usr/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so
Child returncode was: 1

Comment 1 Adam Jackson 2012-02-13 17:28:28 UTC

Ugh, mesa buildsystem.  It default to xlib or dri for libGL based on architecture and arm isn't in the list for DRI.

Fixed in 8.0-0.2.fc17 (just pushed).  Probably we should look into better subpackaging on arm though, there do exist pci arm machines but they're definitely the minority.

Comment 2 Peter Robinson 2012-02-13 17:44:44 UTC

> Fixed in 8.0-0.2.fc17 (just pushed).  Probably we should look into better
> subpackaging on arm though, there do exist pci arm machines but they're
> definitely the minority.

Quite happy to work with you on the changes to the packaging, the amount of devices with PCI is increasing but whether they'll be widely available enough in the short term to bother is another question entirely :-)