Bug 790000

Summary: Rebase virt-who to version 0.6 in RHEL 6.3
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Radek Novacek <rnovacek>
Component: virt-whoAssignee: Radek Novacek <rnovacek>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Entitlement Bugs <entitlement-bugs>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.3CC: huiwang, khong, ovasik, tsmetana, ycui
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Rebase
Target Release: 6.3   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: virt-who-0.6-1.el6 Doc Type: Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements
Doc Text:
No Documentation needed.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-20 10:14:28 EDT Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Comment 3 Hui Wang 2012-04-28 03:16:16 EDT
Verified the bug on rhel6.3-snapshot1.
1. virt-who-0.6-5.el6.noarch on RHEL6.3 re-based virt-who RHEL 5.8.
2. virt-who functional testing test result is PASS as there was no critical regression or test blockers found.

Version:
virt-who-0.6-5.el6.noarch
subscription-manager-0.99.15-1.el6.x86_64
subscription-manager-gnome-0.99.15-1.el6.x86_64
subscription-manager-firstboot-0.99.15-1.el6.x86_64
libvirt-0.9.10-14.el6.x86_64
python-rhsm-0.99.8-1.el6.noarch
katello-headpin-0.1.145-1.el6.noarch
candlepin-tomcat6-0.5.26-1.el6.noarch
candlepin-0.5.26-1.el6.noarch
thumbslug-0.0.21-1.el6.noarch
Comment 4 Radek Novacek 2012-05-02 02:20:14 EDT
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
No Documentation needed.
Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 10:14:28 EDT
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0900.html