Bug 790256

NOTE:  I was not able to find an official pom file for this.  I'm willing to add one, but I'm unaware of any upcoming maven-based packages that will require it.

I'll take this one.

Package Review
==============

Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated

=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x]  Rpmlint output:

rpmlint SPECS/ha-jdbc.spec 
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

rpmlint SRPMS/ha-jdbc-2.0.16-2.fc17.src.rpm 
ha-jdbc.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

[x]  Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x]  Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format %{name}.spec.
[x]  Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x]  Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[x]  Buildroot definition is not present
[x]  Package is lmcicensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines[3,4].
[x]  License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: LGPLv2+
[x]  If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]  All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[x]  Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]  Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package    : 6871bca2b13e6374231083fda8f18371
MD5SUM upstream package: 6871bca2b13e6374231083fda8f18371
[x]  All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x]  Package must own all directories that it creates or must require other packages for directories it uses.
[x]  Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]  File sections do not contain %defattr(-,root,root,-) unless changed with good reason
[x]  Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]  Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x]  Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT mixing)
[x]  Package contains code, or permissable content.
[x]  Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-]  Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]  Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]  Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc subpackage
[x]  Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[x]  Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[!]  Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[-]  Package uses %global not %define
[-]  If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[x]  If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be removed prior to building
[x]  All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[x]  Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[-]  If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when building with ant
[-]  pom files has correct add_maven_depmap

=== Other suggestions ===
[x]  If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[x]  Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[x]  Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[x]  Latest version is packaged.
[x]  Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3819855

=== Issues ===
1. You're trying to package a RC1 version, proper release tag:

Release:        0.1.rc-1%{?dist}

2. You specify twice Require: jpackage-utils and java.
3. Please add Require: jpackage-utils to javadoc subpackage.

=== Final Notes ===
1. You mix the install and mkdir/cp commands. It's not a blocker of course, but please try to standardize on one.

Fixed:

SRPM:
http://downloads.eucalyptus.com/devel/packages/fedora-17/sources/ha-jdbc-2.0.16-0.1.rc1.fc17.src.rpm

SPEC:
http://downloads.eucalyptus.com/devel/packages/fedora-17/SPECS/ha-jdbc.spec

================
*** APPROVED ***
================

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: ha-jdbc
Short Description: High-availability JDBC
Owners: arg
Branches: f17

Git done (by process-git-requests).