| Summary: | CVE-2012-0860 rhev: vds_installer insecure /tmp use | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Other] Security Response | Reporter: | Petr Matousek <pmatouse> |
| Component: | vulnerability | Assignee: | Red Hat Product Security <security-response-team> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | unspecified | CC: | acathrow, alonbl, bazulay, cpelland, danken, dfediuck, iheim, jkt, jrusnack, lpeer, Rhev-m-bugs, security-response-team, yeylon, yzaslavs |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Security |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-03-17 06:08:34 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Bug Depends On: | 790736, 790742, 790747, 850708 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 772458, 850878 | ||
|
Description
Petr Matousek
2012-02-15 09:40:45 UTC
Statement: This issue does affect Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization 2 and 3. Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization 2 is now in Production 2 phase of the support and maintenance life cycle. This issue is not currently planned to be addressed in future updates. For additional information, refer to the Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Life Cycle: https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/rhev/. This issue has been addressed in following products: RHEV-H and Agents for RHEL-6 Via RHSA-2012:1508 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1508.html This issue has been addressed in following products: RHEV Manager version 3.x Via RHSA-2012:1506 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1506.html Hello, Any reason this bug is still opened? Thanks, Hello, Alon. (In reply to Alon Bar-Lev from comment #7) > Any reason this bug is still opened? No reason. Closing. Thanks, Petr |