Bug 791107

Summary:	RHEV-H 6.3 name is incorrect.
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	cshao <cshao>
Component:	rhev-hypervisor6	Assignee:	Mike Burns <mburns>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	6.3	CC:	acathrow, bsarathy, gouyang, jboggs, jpallich, leiwang, mburns, ovirt-maint, shcao, ycui
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Regression, ZStream
Target Release:	6.3
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	rhev-hypervisor6-6.3-20120224.0.el6	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	mburns reviewed -- no tech note needed. This is non-functional, never released bz.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-07-19 13:51:05 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	798183

Description cshao 2012-02-16 08:17:27 UTC

Description of problem:
RHEV-H 6.3 name is incorrect. It show as RHEV- Hypervisor 6.3-20120215.0.fc16.
It will be better if show RHEV- Hypervisor 6.3-20120215.0.el6_3.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rhev-hypervisor6-6.3-20120215.0.el6

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. TUI Install RHEV-H.
2. Focus on RHEV-H name in TUI.
3.
  
Actual results:

#cat /etc/issue
Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Hypervisor release 6.3 (20120215.0.fc16)
Kernel \r on an \m (\l)

Expected results:
RHEV-H name show as RHEV- Hypervisor 6.3-20120215.0.el6_3.

Additional info:

Comment 1 cshao 2012-02-16 09:14:29 UTC

There is no such issue in rhev-hypervisor6-6.2-20120209.0.el6_2.
So it is a regression bug.

Comment 3 Mike Burns 2012-02-16 12:53:08 UTC

Issue is due to running build commands from a Fedora 16 host without setting %dist correctly.  

The Makefile command that generates the release information now correctly sets the %dist.

Comment 4 Mike Burns 2012-02-28 02:30:19 UTC

*** Bug 797767 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Mike Burns 2012-02-28 13:13:54 UTC

    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
mburns reviewed -- no tech note needed.  This is non-functional, never released bz.

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2012-07-19 13:51:05 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0742.html