Bug 793539 (JBEPP-618)

Summary: Docs: Remove step to add jboss negotiation
Product: [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise Portal Platform 5 Reporter: Thomas Heute <theute>
Component: DocumentationAssignee: Scott Mumford <smumford>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: ecs-bugs
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 5.1.0.ER03CC: epp-bugs
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 5.1.0.ER04   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBEPP-618
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-12 00:46:44 UTC Type: Task
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 793433    

Description Thomas Heute 2010-11-10 20:13:49 UTC
project_key: JBEPP

Please remove the step:
"
Add the JBoss Negotiation binary by copying PORTAL_SSO/spnego/jboss-negotiation-2.0.3.GA.jar to jboss-as/server/PROFILE/lib.
"
from the documentation. The library is already part of EAP 5.1

Comment 1 Scott Mumford 2010-11-11 02:39:34 UTC
Thomas, would the instruction still be relevant for users on EPP 5.0?

Comment 2 Scott Mumford 2010-11-11 06:46:02 UTC
Link: Added: This issue is a dependency of JBEPP-517


Comment 3 Thomas Heute 2010-11-11 07:09:06 UTC
Good question, and the answer is that it should also be removed from Branch 5.0

Comment 4 Scott Mumford 2010-11-11 07:23:17 UTC
I just realised the last sentence of the description says EAP 5.1 (I read it as EPP 5.1).

I'll pull that step out of the doc.

Thanks Thomas

Comment 5 Scott Mumford 2010-11-11 07:23:21 UTC
I just realised the last sentence of the description says EAP 5.1 (I read it as EPP 5.1).

I'll pull that step out of the doc.

Thanks Thomas

Comment 6 Thomas Heute 2010-11-11 07:35:08 UTC
But I verified and it was already in EAP 5.0 as well, and should be removed from both versions of the doc

Comment 7 Scott Mumford 2010-11-12 00:46:44 UTC
Content removed