Bug 79386

Summary: kickstart ondisk fails if specified drive missing
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Bill Heiden <bill.heiden>
Component: anacondaAssignee: Jeremy Katz <katzj>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Mike McLean <mikem>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.2Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-07-28 23:17:30 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Bill Heiden 2002-12-11 02:51:08 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 4.0)

Description of problem:
 Within our facility, we are using a general ks.cfg to install machines.  This 
general ks.cfg uses ondisk within the partition section to create filesystems.  
We create /boot, swap, and / on the primary drive (/dev/sda) and then create 
a /vol2 on /dev/sdb.  If the machine does not have a /dev/sdb, then the 
kickstart installation aborts. It would be great if the installation continued 
and posted a message to one of the log files informing us of the error.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Obtain machine with only a single drive
2. Create a ks.cfg that attempts to create a partition/filesystem on a 
secondary non-existent drive.
3. Install using the ks.cfg from step and watch the failure.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Brent Fox 2002-12-11 04:28:53 UTC
Changing component to anaconda since this seems related to kickstart and not the
kickstart configuration tool.

Comment 2 Jeremy Katz 2003-01-10 06:52:39 UTC
Will address as time allows -- in general, kickstart assumes that your kickstart
config is appropriate for the machine being installed on.

Comment 3 Jeremy Katz 2003-07-09 05:02:54 UTC
We give a slightly better exception now.  Still need to catch and provide
user-friendly error messages some day, though.