Bug 794822
| Summary: | trim Summary lines when filing kernel bugs. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dave Jones <davej> |
| Component: | abrt | Assignee: | Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | abrt-devel-list, dhoward, dvlasenk, iprikryl, jmoskovc, kklic, mmilata, mtoman, npajkovs, pfrields |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | abrt-2.0.10-1.fc17 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-04-18 22:59:59 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Dave Jones
2012-02-17 17:54:15 UTC
(In reply to comment #0) > Also, the kernel: is sort of pointless too. We already know it's a kernel > message :-) commit d89a239d66222d3b8e3d4b1b1af5dd64e5e3777f Author: Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs> Date: Mon Feb 20 09:57:17 2012 +0100 bugzilla: exclude appending package name for kernel oops Signed-off-by: Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs> <IRQ> [<ffffffff8106dd4f>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0 ^^^^^ ooh!, our duplication hash calculation wont survive <IRQ> at the beginning of the kernel backtrace. Should I expect something else except <IRQ>? (In reply to comment #0) > Could you change abrt to not include the timestamp in the summary ? > It makes it easier to spot dupes when looking at a list of bugs. commit 30b97427e3028dddc32b69a23907ebdf9c63b26e Author: Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs> Date: Mon Feb 20 14:38:19 2012 +0100 dump-oops: fix removing jiffies time stamp jiffies are unsigned long, so it can be 2^64 long, which is 20 decimal digits Signed-off-by: Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs> not sure where you're seeing <IRQ> in that trace. in bug 771094 and there is even <EOI> :-/ ah, right. That's a stack trace from an interrupt handler In some cases, that will be all we get (see bug 796864 for example) In other cases, we will get this in addition to a regular process stack. Complicated. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789517 is an even more complex example. There we have an exception stack (NMI->EOE), an interrupt stack (IRQ->EOI) and a process stack. I think in cases where we're getting multiple stacks, the hash should just be calculated on the process stack (if present). If not present, give up and hash the whole thing. This is kinda off-topic from the original intent of this bug, which it sounds like you fixed, so feel free to clone this. abrt-2.0.9-1.fc17, libreport-2.0.10-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abrt-2.0.9-1.fc17,libreport-2.0.10-1.fc17 Package abrt-2.0.9-1.fc17, libreport-2.0.10-1.fc17: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing abrt-2.0.9-1.fc17 libreport-2.0.10-1.fc17' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4804/abrt-2.0.9-1.fc17,libreport-2.0.10-1.fc17 then log in and leave karma (feedback). abrt-2.0.10-1.fc17,libreport-2.0.10-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abrt-2.0.10-1.fc17,libreport-2.0.10-2.fc17 abrt-2.0.10-1.fc17, libreport-2.0.10-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |