Bug 795451

Summary:	Review Request: basex - XML database and XPath/XQuery processor
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	dimitar <dimitar.popov>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	akurtako, mizdebsk, package-review
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-01-26 12:13:58 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description dimitar 2012-02-20 15:18:18 UTC

Spec URL: https://api.opensuse.org:443/public/source/home:dimitar_popov/BaseX/basex.spec
SRPM URL: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/dimitar_popov/Fedora_16/src/basex-7.1.1-4.1.src.rpm
Description: BaseX is a very fast and light-weight, yet powerful XML database and
XPath/XQuery processor, including support for the latest W3C Full Text and
Update Recommendations. It supports large XML instances and offers a highly
interactive front-end (basexgui). Apart from two local standalone modes, BaseX
offers a client/server architecture.

Comment 1 Alexander Kurtakov 2012-02-20 16:55:43 UTC

Are you sponsored? If not please block FE-NEEDSPONSOR

* It would be good to keep the build.xml as SourceX instead of catting it in the spec.
* checks like %if 0%{?suse_version} > 1000 make no sense in fedora, we either need it or not
* please install javadocs into %{_javadocdir}/%{name} not in %{_javadocdir}/%{name}-%{version} and drop the symlink/ghost thing
* no need for clean section and cleaning in the install section
* please use desktop-file-install https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files
* where did you get Source0 from ? if it's manually created please either add comments on the exact comments to recreate it or add a script for that as SourceX
* I see references to lucene in the spec but it's not BR/R , would you explain?

Comment 2 dimitar 2012-02-26 20:06:20 UTC

Thanks for the comments. I created a new SPEC file from scratch and a new SRPM. I think address all your remarks in the new version, but if there is anything else, I'll fix it.

Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/BaseXdb/basex-dist/master/linux/fedora/basex.spec
SRPM URL: https://raw.github.com/BaseXdb/basex-dist/master/linux/fedora/basex-7.1.1-1.fc16.src.rpm

Comment 3 Jason Tibbitts 2013-05-01 15:43:37 UTC

I am triaging old review tickets.  I can't promise a review if you reply, but by closing out the stale tickets we can devote extra attention to the ones which aren't stale.

This fails to build for me; here is a scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5321604

Comment 4 Mikolaj Izdebski 2015-01-26 12:13:35 UTC

No response from submitter - closing as WONTFIX. Feel free to reopen this once basex is fixed.

Comment 5 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 01:27:37 UTC

The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days